"Those who do not want to imitate anything, produce nothing."
- Salvador DaliA lot of the lecture looked at the different intents of work that was created online - internet memes, for example, are funny to look at, but lacks value and actual intent because of the superficialness of the work. We also looked at the fine line between association with an previous work, and plagiarism - is intent not the breaking point for this?
The film 'Everything is a Remix' was the exact reasoning behind this. In the first part of this film, 'The Song Remains the Same', was showing different songs throughout the years that sound similar and the lawsuits (or not) they had to face for a few notes of song that could have made the exact likeness out of another. Although some people argue plagiarism, does it not just mean they've had the same creative output and come up with something similar out of pure chance? A lot of older, rock songs seem to all sound the same and have such come up in the first section of the film.
"Legal remixing is fine, illegal copying is not - if your work fails to distinguish itself enough then you must attribute!"
Looking at our audience type, we learned that having a pre-defined idea about the intent of the audience and what our audience is about allows us to create sort of a narrative about our work, and making an assumption, although sometimes a negative thing, allows a much more deeper understanding and the work to have a lot more meaning behind it.

"Don't try to be original. Just try to be good. That sounds sort of naive, but it's true."
- Paul Rand
The point behind the lecture was that, although tools and practice of the trade are extremely useful, an idea is the most important thing and can set you forward the most. This is what I wanted to create in my final project, research was the key, and something that was responsive to the audience was overall what I intended to do - as my skills in the software weren't the best.